Skip to content

President Obama recently announced proposed changes in immigration policies that impact immigration, with many that may specifically influence the EB-5 Program. The purpose of this article is to outline the measures that could impact EB-5.

On the President’s trip to China he announced that Chinese nationals would be eligible to apply for a 10-year tourist visa. This has caused some Chinese to think that there is no reason to apply for residency via EB-5. This reasoning is incorrect for a few reasons. First, while the individual is eligible to receive a visa for 10 years, it does not mean that the person will receive a visa for 10 years. The consulate may choose to issue it for one year. Second, an entry on a tourist visa is for six months. And, third – most importantly – a tourist visa allows a person to vacation in the United States. That person cannot study or reside permanently in the United States. Thus, the EB-5 classification should still be pursued if an individual desires to reside or study in the United States. Next we move to the most recent Executive Action on Immigration by the President.

On Nov. 20, 2014, President Obama outlined changes that would take place without regulatory change, with regulatory change, and a Presidential Memorandum on Visa Modernization. The proposed changes that could potentially impact EB-5 are discussed below.

As it relates to Administration Guidance without New Regulation, it appears that there will be no significant impact on EB-5 as the majority of those changes relate to other visa classifications or those that have been in the United States since Jan. 1, 2010.

With respect to Regulatory Changes through the Administration Procedure Act, there are two key points that could provide a benefit to the EB-5 investor. First, is the goal to enable entrepreneurs to be paroled into the U.S. and work if they are researchers, inventors or founders of businesses. The EB-5 community needs to insist that this should apply to EB-5 investors, as by definition they are “alien entrepreneurs.” If this were to apply to EB-5 investors, then the investor would be permitted to enter the U.S. even before the residency was approved. This would be a tremendous benefit to the investor and family1.

Second, and having a similar impact as the first, is “early adjustment.” This would enable individuals who are eligible to apply for adjustment of status, but for a non-current priority date, to file for adjustment and receive work authorization and advance parole. Therefore, if the I-526 petition were approved, the EB-5 investor and family could file for adjustment of status and receive the above-mentioned benefits. The EB-5 community needs to ask the administration to also allow for EB-5 investors outside the United States to receive the same treatment as those inside the United States who file for “early adjustment.” In the context of the residency process for a foreigner married to a U.S. citizen, if an I-130 is filed for the foreigner who is outside the U.S., the foreigner can file for a K-3 visa to enter the United States while waiting for the residency process. Something similar should be extended to those EB-5 investors outside of the United States. Lastly, we move to the memorandum.

The Presidential Memorandum on Visa Modernization has two points that could positively impact EB-5 investors. First, there is a possibility of recapturing permanent resident numbers based on numbers allocated by Congress but left unused. So, in effect, the additional visas would be carried over to the next year’s available numbers. Therefore, if there is over demand based on the number of visas allocated to EB-5 in one specific year, there exists the possibility that the unused visas from previous years could be used in order to better effect Congressional objectives. This would have a large impact on EB-5 especially if the President allowed the State Department to go back five (5) years or more and recapture the thousands of unused immigrant visas in the EB-5 classification during those years. This would, in effect, ensure there would not be retrogression this year.

Second, and even more impactful, is the possibility of not counting derivative spouses and children toward the Eb-5 visa quota. Currently, when an EB-5 investor files for and has an approved I-526 he and his family count again the 10,000 EB-5 immigrant visa cap. Assuming that the average is three (3) in a family (husband, wife, and child), this means that only 3,333 investors could receive their residency in any given year. However, if the derivatives are not counted, it is clear how that number would be tripled to 10,000 investors. This impact is huge in that it would also substantially reduce the risk of retrogression in the EB-5 classification.

It is important to note that President has set a goal of 120-180 days for the Presidential Memorandum on Visa Modernization. Thus, we are hopeful to see some guidance within the next six months.

The President has set forth some proposed changes that could positively impact the EB-5 community. It is now up to us to lobby the administration to follow through on those proposals so that EB-5 remains strong for businesses and investors.


1The President also proposed expanding the availability of optional practical training for graduating F-1 foreigners and expanding the definition of STEM which could benefit some children of potential EB-5 investors.


The above article is courtesy of the EB-5 Immigration Coalition, of which Laura Reiff is a member.


Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Laura Foote Reiff ‡ Laura Foote Reiff ‡

Laura Foote Reiff has more than 32 years of experience representing businesses and organizations in the business immigration and compliance field. She is also a business immigration advocate and has long chaired prominent business immigration coalitions. Laura is Co-Founder of GT’s Business and

Laura Foote Reiff has more than 32 years of experience representing businesses and organizations in the business immigration and compliance field. She is also a business immigration advocate and has long chaired prominent business immigration coalitions. Laura is Co-Founder of GT’s Business and Immigration and Compliance Group which she co-led since 1999. She currently chairs the Northern Virginia/Washington D.C. Immigration and Compliance Practice. Laura is also Co-Managing Shareholder of the Northern Virginia Office of GT, a position she has held since 2010. As a global leader in the business immigration community, Laura has served on the Boards of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, the American Immigration Council, the National Immigration Forum and is currently the Chair of the America is Better Board.

Laura advises corporations on a variety of compliance-related issues, particularly related to Form I-9 eligibility employment verification matters. Laura has been involved in audits and internal investigations and has successfully minimized monetary exposure as well as civil and criminal liabilities on behalf of her clients. She develops immigration compliance strategies and programs for both small and large companies. Laura performs I-9, H-1B and H-2B compliance inspections during routine internal reviews, while performing due diligence (in the context of a merger, acquisition or sale) or while defending a company against a government investigation.

Laura represents many businesses in creating, managing and using “Regional Centers” that can create indirect jobs toward the 10 new U.S. jobs whose creation can give rise to EB-5 permanent residence for investment. She coordinates this work with attorneys practicing in securities law compliance, with economists identifying “targeted employment areas” and projecting indirect job creation, and with licensed securities brokers coordinating offerings. She also represents individual investors in obtaining conditional permanent residence and in removing conditions from permanent residence.

Laura’s practice also consists of managing business immigration matters and providing immigration counsel to address the visa and work authorization needs of U.S. and global personnel including professionals, managers and executives, treaty investors/ traders, essential workers, persons of extraordinary ability, corporate trainees, and students. She is an immigration policy advocacy expert and works on immigration reform policies.

 Admitted in the District of Columbia and Maryland. Not admitted in Virginia. Practice limited to federal immigration practice.