Each month, the Department of State (DOS) issues a visa bulletin which contains information regarding the availability of immigrant visas. The availability of immigrant visas is subject to numerical caps imposed by Congress, which limit how many foreign nationals may obtain immigrant visas each year. In the employment based green card category Congress allots 140,000 immigrant visas (green cards) to be issued annually. The employment-based categories are subdivided into five preference categories:

  • EB-1: Priority Workers (Extraordinary Ability, Outstanding Professors and Researchers, and Multinational Managers or Executives)
  • EB-2:  Professionals Holding Advanced Degrees and Persons of Exceptional Ability
  • EB-3:  Skilled Workers, Professionals, and Unskilled Workers
  • EB-4:  Certain Special Immigrants including Religious Workers
  • EB-5:  Immigrant Investors

No one country in each of the five categories is allowed to exceed more than 7 percent of the category per the requirement of 8 U.S. Code § 1153.

The employment-based fifth preference category “EB-5” is allotted 10,000 immigrant visas annually. The 10,000 quota includes principal applicants, as well as spouses and dependent children under 21 years of age.  The visas are issued from October 1st (the first date of the government’s fiscal year) until September 30th.  On October 1st of each year, the quota of visas is reset.

In order to deal with these numerical limits, sometimes the DOS has to establish a wait line that determines the order in which immigrant visas are issued when the annual quota is exhausted in a particular year. The DOS uses an applicant’s “priority date” to determine when an applicant can apply for an immigrant visa or file an adjustment of status in the U.S.  An applicant’s priority date is based upon the day their I-526 petition was received by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS).  As you can see from the below example, the priority date is listed on the top of an investor’s I-526 approval notice.

Ex1

In this example, our applicant has a priority date of Aug. 20, 2014. The applicant then must check the DOS visa bulletin to find out if his or her priority date is current. If the visa bulletin, lists the priority date as current represented by a letter “C” then the applicant can apply for a green card either through immigrant visa Consular Processing at the U.S. Embassy in their home country or through the filing of an I-485, Application for Adjustment of Status with the USCIS in the United States upon the approval of their I-526 petition.  An applicant that applies for the green card in the United States through Adjustment of Status, must be in valid non-immigrant visa status to do so.  As part of the Adjustment of Status filing, the U.S. based applicant, as well as their dependent applicants, are entitled to receive work authorization through the issuance of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) , as well as travel authorization known as Advance Parole (AP).

March Visa Bulletin

In addition to checking if a category is current, the applicant must also ensure that they are not born in a country which has exceeded the 7 percent allotment for immigrant visas for the particular fiscal year.  If their country of birth is a country that has exceeded its yearly allotment then a wait line for the filing the green card application develops, known as retrogression.  When retrogression of priority dates occurs, then it is important for an applicant to check to see if they can file their green card application after their EB-5 petition is approved by checking the visa bulletin on a monthly basis.  If a date is listed on the visa bulletin, an applicant can only file their application if their priority date is on or before the date listed on the visa bulletin.  If the priority date is later than the date listed on the visa bulletin, the applicant will have to check back the following month when the DOS issues its next visa bulletin to see if their priority date has become current (i.e. if the priority date is now earlier than the date listed on the visa bulletin).  The dates in the visa bulletin will either move forward, back or even stay stagnant and such changes will be reported monthly.  These movements in the visa bulletin are based on the number of green card applications received during the previous month and the available spots remaining in the category.  Likewise, sometimes the category can move forward if the other EB categories are underutilized because DOS then reallocates their numbers to the categories with backlogs. For example, if the EB-1 category is not used, EB-5 may benefit from a partial reallocation of the unused immigrant visa numbers.

At present the EB-5 visa category is current.  However, the DOS has informed EB-5 stakeholders that in June of 2015 they expect the priority dates to retrogress to at least two years to May of 2013.  Using the approval notice above and a sample visa bulletin based on this information pasted below, we consider how to read the visa bulletin for an applicant born in mainland China with an EB-5 priority date of August 20, 2014. The applicant will not be able to file their green card application because the EB-5 category is not current and in fact it is estimated that it will be at least a year until their priority date will become current.  For newer EB-5 applicants, based on pending estimates, it would appear that when Chinese retrogression occurs later this year most applicants will have at least a two year wait before they can file for their green cards.

Sample Visa Bulletin

Likewise, if the total number of visas has been used up in a particular year, in a particular category the visa bulletin will note that the category is unavailable, which is represented by a “U.”  This can occur when the DOS determines no more immigrant visas can be issued at the present time. See the EB-4 category above for mainland China for a representation of how this appears.

While China is expected to retrogress, other countries using the EB-5 visa will stay current and be able to precede with their green card applications upon I-526 petition approval.  Those born in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Macau will not be subject to retrogression as it only extends to Mainland born Chinese.  Likewise, if someone is applying with their spouse and the spouse is born in a non-PRC country, the Chinese born spouse can “charge” their nationality to their spouse and proceed with the green card application based on that non-Chinese nationality.

While retrogression is a new development for many Chinese EB-5 applicants, the EB-2 and EB-3 categories for Chinese nationals have been backlogged between 5-10 years for quite some time.  In this sense, EB-5 is still a more expeditious way to obtain a green card while also permitting investors flexibility in terms of being dependent on an employer in their immigration petition.

In the case of retrogression, for those applicants applying from the U.S., though they may not process for the green card until the priority date is current, there is some relief that they can avail themselves of if they file their Adjustment of Status application before retrogression is effective.  First, they can continue to remain in the U.S. indefinitely as “Adjustment of Status” applicants without maintaining an underlying non-immigrant visa status.  They will also be able to annually renew their EAD and AP to permit them to work and travel until their green card applications are adjudicated.  If there is a movement in priority dates, they will have their petition already in queue for adjudication.

For applicants who apply for consular processing in the event of retrogression, the NVC and Consulates will hold the application until the priority dates become current.  For children close to the age of 21, they may lose their ability to derive from their parent’s application depending on how long they are subject to retrogression.  In this case, they may need to apply for the EB-5 immigrant investor visa on their own or seek an alternative path towards U.S. immigration.  Likewise, individuals who spend a year or more in retrogression may also need to supplement their application at the time that their application becomes current with updated documentation such as new police certificates and medical examinations. Fortunately, for individuals who have submitted their DS-260 and documents to the consulate, and the consulate has scheduled them for an immigrant visa interview, those individuals immigrant visa applications would be processed for a green card since a visa number was allotted at the time the interview was scheduled.  For those that cannot immediately process, the recent change in visa reciprocity allows Chinese nationals some relief in that they now can obtain a ten year multiple reentry visitor visa and will provide investors the ability to travel to the U.S. while their priority date is not current albeit on a temporary basis.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kate Kalmykov Kate Kalmykov

Kate Kalmykov is based in our New York and New Jersey offices and has over two decades of experience in business immigration matters. Kate currently Co-Chairs the Global Immigration & Compliance Practice at Greenberg Traurig. In this role, she works with employers of

Kate Kalmykov is based in our New York and New Jersey offices and has over two decades of experience in business immigration matters. Kate currently Co-Chairs the Global Immigration & Compliance Practice at Greenberg Traurig. In this role, she works with employers of all sizes across a variety of industries in understanding and complying with the immigration laws relating to the hiring and retention of foreign talent. Specifically, her practice focuses on supporting clients and advising them on temporary and permanent residency immigration options for multi-national executive, business, scientific, and information technology personnel. In addition, her practice provides support to companies in the global transfer of personnel. Known by her clients for her out-of-the-box thinking, responsiveness and hands-on approach, Kate is often called upon to assist in developing immigration options and strategies in the most unique circumstances and to respond to complex Requests for Evidence (RFEs), Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs) or to appeal denied cases. Likewise, she has also been instrumental in developing employer compliance programs for DOL related filings including H-1Bs and PERMs, as well as for I-9 employment eligibility verification. To this end, she develops and conducts nationwide I-9 compliance trainings and policy manuals for human resources personnel, advises on best practices for E-Verify employers, provides guidance on avoiding immigration-related unfair employment practices claims and has defended and minimized penalties in immigration-related government audits. Kate regularly works with professionals from the firm’s labor, employment, tax and benefits groups, to provide strategic planning on immigration issues within a cross-border framework.

Kate also has deep experience working on all aspects of the EB-5 immigrant investor program. Kate has worked with real estate developers, private equity funds, and other organizations on applications to designate new EB-5 Regional Centers, applications for pre-approval of EB-5 projects; having projects adopted by existing EB-5 Regional Centers; structuring projects to be EB-5 compliant, the sale of existing EB-5 Regional Centers, preparing template I-526 petitions and advice on structuring direct EB-5 projects. Pursuant to the requirements introduced under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act, Kate works with EB-5 Regional Centers, EB-5 Projects, Overseas Migration Agents and Broker/ Dealers to develop internal programs for ongoing compliance and to prepare USCIS I-956, I-956F, I-956,G, I-956H, I-956K submissions. Kate has represented thousands of investors in obtaining their green cards through EB-5 regional center projects, as well as direct EB-5 investment opportunities. She also represented and structured the largest EB-5 offering in the Program’s history and has over the course of her career structured over $12 billion in EB-5 deals.

Within the field of immigration law, Kate is a well-known speaker and author. She is often called upon by various media outlets to comment on topics of business immigration law including the Real Deal, the Wall Street Journal, and Law360. Kate has appeared on numerous TV programs related to immigration law including CNN, the Stoler Report, Vietface TV, and China Business Network. Kate is also a prolific writer on the topic of immigration and has been published in immigration practice handbooks for the American Bar Association, American Immigration Lawyers Association, ILW, and in news periodicals that include the New Jersey Lawyer, the New York Law Journal, the New Jersey Law Journal, USA Today, GlobeSt.com, and the Commercial Observer. At the request of the American Bar Association, Kate co-authored the book “What Every Lawyer Needs to Know About Immigration Law,” a guide for non-lawyers on immigration law practice. She has sat on numerous bar association related committees including the American Immigration Lawyers Association EB-5 Practice Committee, the New Jersey Business Immigration Coalition and has chaired the American Bar Association’s, Committee on Immigration and Naturalization, Section of Administrative Law since 2011. Kate has been recognized in various legal surveys including Chambers Global, New York Super Lawyers, the New Jersey Law Journal who ranked as her as a “New Leader of the Bar,” (formerly 40 under 40) in 2012, NJBIZ “Best 50 Women in Business,” 2019, National Law Review, “Go-To Thought Leader: Immigration Law,” 2022, and Lawdragon 500, Leading U.S. Corporate Employment Lawyers, 2020-2022.

Kate is devoted to pro bono matters and has spent extensive time helping clients fleeing conflict and persecution with asylum applications, applying for and obtaining Temporary Protected Status and Humanitarian Parole.