In 1998, the Administrative Appeals Office (“AAO”) issued a precedent decision known as Matter of Ho that set forth the requirements of an EB-5 compliant business plan.  According to Matter of Ho, as part of an I-526 petition an EB-5 investor must submit a comprehensive business plan demonstrating the following elements:

  • A description of the  EB-5 business, its products, services and objectives
  • A market analysis, including the
    • names of competing businesses and their relative strengths and weaknesses,
    • a comparison of the competition’s products and pricing structures, and
    • a description of the target market/prospective customers of the new commercial enterprise.
  • Confirmation and listing that the company has received or is in the process of applying for project specific permits and/ or licenses
  • If applicable the EB-5 business plan should describe the manufacturing or production process, the materials required, and the supply sources
  • Detail any contracts executed for the supply of materials and/or the distribution of products
  • Provide an overview of the marketing strategy of the business, including pricing, advertising, and servicing
  • The business plan should outline the business’s organizational structure and it’s personnel experience
  • The business plan must also explain the business’s staffing requirements and contain a timetable for hiring and job descriptions for all positions
  • Contain sales, cost, and income projections and detail the bases therefore
  • Finally, the business plan must be credible

Additional requirements related to business plans were imposed by the December 2009 Neufeld Memorandum which introduced the concept of “material change.”  The memo noted that any change in a business plan might be considered material and may result    denial of investors’ I-829 petitions.  Draft guidance issued in November of 2011 and January of 2012 by USCIS, aims to loosen this requirement somewhat,  However, that guidance has not yet been finalized as binding policy guidance by the USCIS.  In light of the current interpretation of material change, EB-5 business plans that are general and conservative in their projections may have an easier time passing muster at the I-829 stage.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Kate Kalmykov Kate Kalmykov

Kate Kalmykov Co-Chairs the Immigration & Compliance Practice. She focuses her practice on business immigration and compliance. She represents clients in a wide-range of employment based immigrant and non-immigrant visa matters including students, trainees, professionals, managers and executives, artists and entertainers, treaty investors

Kate Kalmykov Co-Chairs the Immigration & Compliance Practice. She focuses her practice on business immigration and compliance. She represents clients in a wide-range of employment based immigrant and non-immigrant visa matters including students, trainees, professionals, managers and executives, artists and entertainers, treaty investors and traders, persons of extraordinary ability and immigrant investors.

Kate has deep experience working on EB-5 immigrant investor matters. She regularly works with developers across a variety of industries, as well as private equity funds on developing new projects that qualify for EB-5 investments. This includes creation of new Regional Centers, having projects adopted by existing Regional Centers or through pooled individual EB-5 petitions. For existing Regional Centers, Kate regularly helps to prepare amendment filings, file exemplar petitions, address removal of conditions issues and ensure that they develop an internal program for ongoing compliance with applicable immigration regulations and guidance. She also counsels foreign nationals on obtaining greencards through either individual or Regional Center EB-5 investments, as well as issues related to I-829 Removal of Conditions.

Kate also works with various human resources departments on I-9 employment verification matters as well as H-1B and LCA compliance. She regularly counsels employers on due diligence issues including internal audits and reviews, as well as minimization of exposure and liabilities in government investigations.