Search results for: EB-5 stakeholder program

On April 25, 2023, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) hosted a stakeholder engagement webinar regarding the Immigrant Investor Program (EB-5), during which they discussed regulations being drafted to comply with the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA). USCIS planned three discussion topics for the call, including the “winding up” of regional centers no longer operating under the RIA, updates to the “at risk” requirements for investors who filed Form I-526E Petitions after the RIA passage, and Form I-956K applications for migration agent registrations. At the outset of the stakeholder engagement, however, USCIS stated they were not prepared to discuss the winding up of regional centers or the new “at risk” requirements. Instead, the call only focused on clarifications of Form I-956K, Registration for Direct and Third-Party Promoters, and other EB-5 related issues.

The Form I-956K was published in response to the RIA requiring all direct and third-party promoters to register with USCIS. On the stakeholder call, USCIS clarified the following for I-956K completion:

  • Who must file I-956K? The person or entity that entered into the written agreement with the new commercial enterprise or regional center to market the project must file the form. In addition, certain employees of the third-party promoter or migration agent also must complete the form and file it with USCIS:
    • Executives or officers, or those who are actively promoting the EB-5 Program, should file Form I-956K. Based on this guidance, marketing staff at migration agents may need to complete this form and file it with USCIS.
    • Personnel not involved in the sale of EB-5, such as document processing specialists, are not required to file Form I-956K.
  • USCIS also stated on the call that if any agent commits fraud or material misrepresentation on the I-956K, USCIS can deny associated I-526E Petitions.
  • Filing of the I-956K is based on the promotion of the project; if the project is no longer being promoted because it was sold to investors who filed before the passage of the RIA (even if payments to agents are ongoing), the migration agents do not need to register on the basis of those older projects.
  • USCIS will publish lists of agents and promoters registered through I-956K on their website in the future.

USCIS also stated on the call that an EB-5 investor’s capital must be at risk and remain invested during the two-year period of conditional residences for those investors who filed I-526 Petitions before the passage of the RIA. This requirement did not change for investors who filed prior to March 15, 2022. USCIS did not comment on the new “at risk” requirements for investors who filed Form I-526E Petitions after the passage of the RIA.

USCIS also made the following general comments:

  • If USCIS terminates a regional center, they will notify all investors with a pending I-526/I-526E.
  • All regional centers must pay the Integrity Fund fee regardless of when they are designated.
  • USCIS does not encourage the submission of project documents along with I-526E Petitions, as the complete project documents were already included in the Form I-956F Application.
  • USCIS is taking steps to transition to electronic submission of Form I-526E and Form I-526.

USCIS did not discuss IPO operations, adjudication trends, or processing times during this call.

On Tuesday, April 25, 2023, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) will host a stakeholder engagement webinar regarding the Immigrant Investor Program (EB-5). The webinar, scheduled for 1:30 – 3:00 PM EDT, will provide a platform for USCIS to share pertinent information (e.g., adjudication trends, recent issues, and policy updates) with external EB-5 stakeholders. Moreover, the webinar will also allow stakeholders to provide feedback on USCIS’ policies related to the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program.

Click here to register for the event. 

On May 17, 2019, EB-5 Industry stakeholder groups, led by the EB-5 Investment Coalition, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, The Real Estate Roundtable, IIUSA, Rural Alliance, Real Estate Board of New York, AILA, among others, submitted a joint letter to Senate and House Judiciary Committees leadership in support of principle reforms and reauthorization of the EB-5 Regional Center Program, which is set to expire on September 30, 2019.

Proposed reforms include-

  • A six-year reauthorization of the EB-5 Regional Center Program.
  • Enhanced integrity measures to ensure national security and fraud deterrence, such as conducting criminal background checks on individuals involved in regional centers, strengthening the regional center compliance measures, and increasing scrutiny of around immigrant issues involving fraud, misrepresentation or national security concerns.
  • Propose new TEA definition. In particular, with respect to the Urban Distressed Area Definition, the letter suggests limiting the TEAs to a single-census tract that is designated by the U.S. Treasury Department as a “Qualified Opportunity Zone” as per the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
  • Set aside 30% of the annual visa allotment each year for investors in TEA projects, which is split evenly between Rural and Urban Distressed communities (i.e. 15% of visas for Rural TEAs and 15% visas for Urban TEAs).
  • Propose that family members do not count against the annual EB-5 visa cap.

For details on the list of reforms proposed in this letter, please visit here.   We will closely monitor the progress of the reforms proposed and will provide updates as they become available.

On March 3, 2017, the USCIS Immigrant Investor Program Office (IPO) held an EB-5 Stakeholder Engagement in which several important updates to the program were provided.

“Unofficial” Statistics for Fiscal Year 2017

From October to December 2016, USCIS saw a surge in petition filings, likely due to an upcoming sunset in the EB-5 regional center program as well as an increase in USCIS filing fees that took effect on Dec. 23, 2016. Specifically, there were 4,395 I-526 petitions filed; 184 I-924 applications filed; and 752 I-829 petitions filed. During this time, USCIS adjudicated 3,583 I-526 petitions (a 120 percent increase), 88 I-924 applications and 112 I-829 petitions. IPO noted that they are currently receiving petitions and applications at a rate faster than they can adjudicate, but hope that this will change with increased hiring and improved efficiency of processes.

Processing Times

USCIS is authorized to hire up to 247 employees over the fiscal year 2017, which will hopefully have a positive effect on improving processing times. IPO also hopes that the creation of a dedicated I-829 adjudication division will increase output on adjudications of all relevant applications and petitions in the EB-5 category.

In order to improve efficiency of process, the IPO also provided a list of ten filing recommendations to the Stakeholders:

  1. Identify dual filings in the cover letter for filings for a project submitted to USCIS on both an I-924 application and an I-526 petition.
  2. I-924 applications do not need to include organizational or transactional documents unless associated with an Exemplar I-526 petition.
  3. If submitting an interfiling with updated documents, highlight the changes.
  4. Do not submit bound petitions or applications to USCIS and do not submit double-sided pages.
  5. Submit a cover letter with the I-526 petition that clearly notes whether it is a regional center or direct investment, and include a summary of the evidence provided.
  6. Submit a table of contents or index with each filing and include corresponding tabs for each piece of evidence.
  7. Provide page numbers for each document.
  8. Submit clear and legible copies of the evidence provided.
  9. Provide complete English translations for all foreign language documents submitted.
  10. Notify USCIS immediately should the applicant or petitioner choose to withdraw the case.

Dedicated I-829 Adjudication Division

In October 2016, the IPO created a division of adjudicators and economists who will focus solely on the adjudication and customer service-related inquiries on Form I-829 Petitions by Entrepreneurs to Remove Conditions on Permanent Resident Status. The I-829 division has 3 teams with 8 adjudicators and economists on each team; a senior member of each team will be tasked with interviewing select I-829 petitioners and most interviews will be conducted remotely. USCIS hopes that the creation of a dedicated I-829 division will speed up the processing times for I-829 adjudications going forward.

Compliance Measures

The IPO is continuing to grow its compliance unit, which currently consists of 3 separate branches, to ensure that regional centers and non-regional center new commercial enterprises with pooled EB-5 investments comply with the applicable laws and policies. One branch will focus on the review of Form I-924A applications through which regional centers demonstrate their continued eligibility for regional center designation. Another branch will be responsible for handling actions such as Notices of Intent to Terminate and Notices of Terminations for regional centers. The third branch will oversee regional center audits, the first of which will be conducted next month.

In a further effort to enhance the integrity of the EB-5 program, the IPO will continue to conduct site visits by its 13 site inspectors, who received comprehensive training on the EB-5 program. Over the fiscal year 2017, the IPO anticipates that it will conduct approximately 250 site visits to both new commercial enterprises (NCE) and job creating entities (JCE). IPO reiterated that there typically is no advance notice for site visits. Rather, the site inspector will visit the premises on a fact-finding mission to evaluate whether the NCE or JCE is operating as expected and will assess the findings of a site visit in the context of the petitioner’s filings with USCIS

Commitment to Transparency

In addition to the updated list of terminated regional centers on the USCIS IPO website, the IPO will soon begin to publish regional center termination notices so that Stakeholders can easily access and review termination notices without making a FOIA request. Termination notices will be published in a USCIS electronic reading room (further details will be provided when the site goes live). IPO feels it is important to publish regional center termination notices so that investors and the general public can better understand why a particular regional center was terminated and know the types of activities that will lead to regional center termination.

Additionally, IPO will soon begin publishing approval and denial statistics for each active regional center.

Policy Change Regarding Regional Center Geographic Area Expansion

On Nov. 30, 2016, USCIS published Part G of its Policy Memo, which superseded the guidance found in the May 30, 2013, Policy Memo with regard to the expansion of the geographic scope of a regional center. Per the May 2013 Policy Memo, a regional center could file an amended I-924 application requesting an expansion of the regional center’s geographic scope, and could concurrently file I-526 petitions relying on the proposed expanded geography during the pendency of the I-924 amendment application. However, with the new Form I-924 which is effective as of Dec. 23, 2016, this is no longer the case.

In what was unquestionably the most controversial update from this Stakeholder Engagement, IPO announced that it would continue to adjudicate all I-526 petitions filed before Dec. 23, 2016 based on the guidance from the May 2013 Policy Memo. However, for all I-526 petitions filed on or after Dec. 23, 2016, the current guidance from the new Policy Memo must be followed: I-526 petitions based on investment in a geographic area not previously approved will be deniable due to ineligibility at the time of filing. In other words, as of Dec. 23, 2016, an I-924 amendment application to expand the geographic scope of a regional center must be approved before investors can file an I-526 petition based on that expanded geographic area. This announcement has serious implications for pending petitions that were filed in reliance on the prior policy and Stakeholders were vigilant in their requests for IPO to reconsider this unexpected change in policy.

Source of Funds Questions

Several questions were asked by Stakeholders regarding source of funds and path of funds issues for I-526 petitions, including inquiries regarding the use of bitcoin and other virtual currencies as the source of funds as well as investments made from joint bank accounts owned by the investor and a family member. As expected, IPO reiterated that any EB-5 investment must meet the relevant regulatory and statutory requirements (i.e., the petition must demonstrate that the funds invested were acquired directly and indirectly by lawful means and that the investor owned and controlled the funds invested). Additionally, IPO confirmed that there is no statutory or regulatory prohibition against minor petitioners, as long as the I-526 petition demonstrates the investor’s ability to contract under the relevant law.

The USCIS Immigrant Investor Program Office (IPO) held its first stakeholder engagement of 2016 on Feb. 3. Primarily speaking for USCIS were Nicholas Colucci, Chief of the IPO, Julia Harrison, Deputy Chief of the IPO, and Laurie McKenzie, the new Division Chief of Policy and Performance.

Processing Times and Backlog Reduction Issues

As has been the case of the past 2 years, the IPO continues to expand its staffing. Staff levels currently stand at 113 and are expected to be increased to 171 by the end of the fiscal year. This is being done with the goal of reducing case processing times to under 6 months.

However, as of Jan. 26, 2016, the preliminary processing times reported by Mr. Colucci were 15.5 months for I-526 Petitions, 7.9 months for I-924 Applications, and 15.7 months for I-829 Petitions. These are expected to increase as the IPO currently has 21,790 pending I-526 Petitions, 902 pending I-924 Applications, and 4,314 pending I-829 Petitions. If each I-526 Petition represents a $500,000 investment, that would equate to approximately $10.895 billion worth of capital potentially waiting to be deployed in the U.S. Additionally, even assuming only 90 percent of the I-526 Petitions will be successful in creating 10 U.S. jobs, 19,611 (90 percent of 21,790) I-526 Petitions equates to approximately 196,110 U.S. jobs potentially held in the balance as the IPO works through this backlog.

Mr. Colucci expounded on the recent rise in processing times being attributed to the incredible volume of I-526 Petitions filed prior to Sept. 30, 2015 and Dec. 11, 2015, as well as the IPO’s desire to adjudicate the oldest pending cases. Mr. Colucci also discussed the fact that senior adjudicators spent time training many junior individuals to handle complex cases so that processing times could decrease in the future.

Regional Center Compliance and Other Issues

With respect to regional center matters, Mr. Colucci expanded on the compliance division he previously announced to review Form I-924As, the annual compliance filing for regional centers. He also reported that seven (7) notices of intent to terminate for failure to promote economic growth have been issued to regional centers. It appears most of these likely dealt with fraud allegations or other impermissible uses of funds (i.e., spending EB-5 funds on recruiting trips to China, commission payments to agents, etc.). However, the majority of terminations are still for those regional centers who simply fail to file.

Mr. Colucci also reported that 25 regional centers had changed their names at the request of USCIS and 18 had removed the Department of Homeland Security seal from their logos or marketing materials. In order to ease this process, Mr. Colucci stated that the USCIS website, which lists regional centers, now includes ID numbers and former names. Unfortunately, this information is not yet listed in the HTML list but in a separate PDF link accessible on that page.

Mr. Colucci also noted that USCIS was expanding its site visit program where Fraud Detection and National Security offices would make unannounced visits to sites of projects or addresses of the new commercial enterprise or job creating enterprise. He also stated that the IPO is developing an audit program for auditing a regional center’s records. This audit program could include site visits to a regional center’s designated address for auditing purposes.

Ms. Harrison provided helpful guidance that if a regional center is terminated, an EB-5 investor in conditional permanent residency will not have his or her conditional permanent residency terminated or revoked. The EB-5 investor will still have the opportunity to apply for removal of conditions. However, when questioned about whether this would apply to someone with a pending I-526 Petition, or someone with an approved I-526 Petition who had not yet entered the U.S., the IPO deflected.

Lastly, despite multiple callers requesting this information, USCIS reiterated that it has no capacity or plans to break out processing times for regional center applications by exemplar, hypothetical or actual.

I-829 Petition Issues

Mr. Colucci stated that they would begin to issue interview notices for I-829 Petitions. This is something that traditionally has never happened. When asked in the question and answer session if regional centers would have standing to attend such interviews, the IPO responded that they do anticipate allowing attorneys and regional center representatives attend such interviews if the petitioner so chooses. It remains to be seen how effective this will be at addressing project specific issues with EB-5 investors. For example, this is in contrast to the ability of a regional center applicant filing an I-924 application to request a hearing or in-person review of the application during or after the adjudication process.

USCIS also went over the process for denial of an I-829 Petition. If USCIS has a record that the person is in the country, USCIS will issue a Notice to Appear before an immigration judge to begin removal proceedings for that person.

New Division of Policy and Performance

Laurie McKenzie was introduced as the head of a new division which is focusing on policy and performance of the IPO. To that end, she discussed that her division was in charge of considering comments and revisions to the August 2015 draft memorandum. She is also going to be reviewing all the forms, including the Form I-526, Form I-924 and Form I-924A, for potential updates. Lastly, she noted that USCIS and the Department of State have prepared guidance in the event the EB-5 Program sunsets, but that it will not be issued unless sunset occurs.

Source of Funds Issues – Authenticated Documents and Private Currency Exchanges

Ms. Harrison responded with some general answers to popular submitted questions, mostly dealing with source of funds. She reiterated that a private currency exchange or exchange of funds is permissible but that USCIS may require evidence to validate that 3 party’s source of funds for the exchange of funds.  Ms. Harrison also stated that USCIS may request authenticated documents if it receives documents which it believes are fraudulent. However, there is no requirement to submit authenticated documents unless USCIS requests them explicitly.

Odds and Ends

Of particular note was that USCIS was coordinating with the SEC regarding guidance on the reinvestment of capital, which may implicate the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which governs Registered Investment Advisers. Registered Investment Advisers are the individuals or firms who provide advice on investments to clients.

Requests were made for USCIS to publish Form I-924A data which were taken under consideration, as was the suggestion that it be publicly available to the regional centers that receive Notices of Intent to Terminate. Mr. Colucci also stated that he expected the Commerce Department to issue its report on the EB-5 Program, but not before the end of February. The next stakeholder engagement is preliminarily planned for April 25, 2016, and it will include an in-person component.

On July 2, 2026, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that would revise the regulations governing the EB‑5 Immigrant Investor Program and fully implement the EB‑5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (RIA). The proposed rule addresses numerous aspects of the EB‑5 program, including investor eligibility, regional center compliance, targeted employment area (TEA) determinations, priority date retention, audits, enforcement authority, and automatic revocation provisions.

Background

The EB‑5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 reauthorized the Regional Center Program through Sept. 30, 2027, while introducing extensive reforms designed to strengthen oversight and enhance investor protections. Since the RIA’s enactment, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has implemented many statutory changes through policy guidance, new forms, and adjudication practices. However, many provisions have not yet been incorporated into the agency’s formal regulations. The NPRM seeks to close that gap by updating regulations in 8 C.F.R. Parts 204, 205, 216, and 235. 

For the EB‑5 industry, the proposed rule is important because it would provide regulatory clarity in areas where market participants have relied primarily on statutory language, policy manuals, and agency interpretation since 2022.

Key Proposed Changes

  1. Codification of RIA Integrity Measures
    The principal objective of the proposed rule is to formally codify the enhanced integrity framework established by Congress in 2022. The NPRM would expand DHS authority to conduct audits, site visits, investigations, and other compliance reviews of regional centers, new commercial enterprises, and associated parties. Regional centers would face strengthened recordkeeping, reporting, and compliance obligations consistent with the RIA’s anti‑fraud objectives.

    For regional centers and project sponsors, the proposal reinforces the importance of robust compliance programs and internal controls as DHS continues to increase oversight of EB‑5 activities.
  2. Clarification of Investor Eligibility Requirements
    The proposed rule addresses DHS’s effort to provide greater regulatory clarity regarding investor eligibility requirements, many of which have been governed by a combination of statutory language, policy guidance, and agency precedent since the RIA’s enactment. The proposed rule seeks to harmonize these authorities and establish clearer standards for EB-5 adjudications.

    The NPRM proposes updates to eligibility standards, including new regulatory definitions and clarifications regarding qualifying investments, capital, and job creation requirements. According to DHS, these revisions are intended to align existing regulations with the statutory framework established under the RIA and longstanding agency interpretation.

    The rule would also codify the current statutory investment thresholds of $1,050,000 for standard EB‑5 investments and $800,000 for qualifying TEA and infrastructure projects, subject to automatic inflation adjustments and other factors beginning Jan. 1, 2027, and every five years thereafter. 
  3. Priority Date Retention
    The NPRM proposes regulations implementing the RIA’s priority date retention provisions, which are designed to provide greater flexibility and protection for investors facing project-related complications. Investors who meet specified requirements may be able to retain the priority date from an earlier approved petition when filing a subsequent petition. The proposed regulations seek to clarify the circumstances in which this protection may be available.

    This provision may be relevant for investors navigating project‑related challenges or other circumstances requiring refiling.
  4. Targeted Employment Areas (TEAs)
    The NPRM would further define the methodology and criteria for TEA determinations. Since the RIA’s enactment, USCIS has assumed primary responsibility for TEA adjudications, replacing the prior framework that relied heavily on state agencies. DHS now seeks to formally incorporate these standards into regulation.

    Because TEA qualification remains central to the reduced investment threshold available to many investors, additional regulatory clarity may be of interest to project developers, economists, and investors.
  5. Restrictions on Certain Financing Arrangements
    DHS also proposes changes involving bridge financing and capital requirements. Among the notable provisions, the agency proposes eliminating the use of repaid bridge financing in certain circumstances and further refining what constitutes qualifying capital for EB‑5 purposes.

    These updates may have implications for project structuring and source‑of‑funds analysis.
  6. Automatic Revocation and Investor Protections
    Among the closely watched components of the proposal are automatic revocation provisions and the treatment of investors affected by regional center termination or misconduct. The RIA introduced investor protection mechanisms designed to shield good‑faith investors from adverse actions occurring outside their control. DHS proposes regulatory guidance explaining how these statutory protections would operate in practice.

    This portion of the rule may provide greater certainty regarding the consequences of regional center sanctions and the circumstances under which immigration benefits may be preserved.

Potential Impact on the EB‑5 Industry

Although many of the proposed changes reflect statutory requirements already in effect, formal regulations provide a level of certainty that policy guidance alone cannot. Investors, regional centers, project sponsors, and practitioners have navigated a rapidly evolving post‑RIA environment since 2022. Comprehensive regulations may help reduce ambiguity and create more predictable adjudication standards going forward.

The NPRM also reflects DHS’s continued commitment to enforcing the integrity‑focused reforms enacted by Congress. Enhanced oversight, expanded compliance obligations, and clarified eligibility standards are expected to remain central features of the EB‑5 program.

Looking Ahead

The proposed rule is not yet effective, and changes may occur before a final rule is issued. Stakeholders should review the proposal and consider submitting comments on provisions that may affect regional center operations, project financing structures, investor eligibility, and petition adjudications. DHS has provided a 60‑day public comment period following publication in the Federal Register.

The newly released USCIS proposed fee rule includes reductions to several key EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program filing fees.

At a time when USCIS fees have largely trended upward due to inflation, staffing, and backlog-related costs, the proposed decreases for EB-5 filings stand out as a noteworthy development for regional centers and investors alike.

Proposed EB-5 Fee Reductions

According to the newly proposed rule, the following filing fees are set to decrease:

  • Form I-526E (Immigrant Petition by Regional Center Investor): from $11,160 → $9,625;
  • Form I-956F (Application for Approval of an Investment in a Commercial Enterprise): from $47,695 → $29,935;
  • Form I-956 (Application for Regional Center Designation): from $47,695 → $28,895;
  • Form I-956 (Amendment): from $47,695 → $18,480; and
  • Form I-956G (Regional Center Annual Statement): from $4,470 → $2,740.

New fees would also apply to Form I-956H (Bona Fides of Persons Involved with Regional Center Program) and Form I-956K (Regional Center Investor Compliance Certification), though the changes in those categories are not as significant.

Why This Matters

It is rare for USCIS to reduce filing fees absent litigation—particularly within a complex and high-stakes category like EB-5. Historically, USCIS has justified fee increases by citing the need for operational funding and efficiency improvements. The decision to lower EB-5-related fees may reflect recognition of the program’s administrative challenges and the importance of maintaining accessibility for regional centers and investors post-Reform and Integrity Act (RIA).

Litigation Concerns and the RIA Fee Study

Interestingly, USCIS appears to be deliberately distancing itself from the RIA’s mandated fee study and adjustment process, potentially due to ongoing and potential litigation surrounding the agency’s authority to impose and structure certain EB-5 fees. By proposing independent revisions rather than relying on the RIA’s framework, USCIS may be seeking to insulate itself from future challenges while maintaining operational control over the program’s financial structure.

What Comes Next

The rule is still in the proposed stage, meaning there will be a public comment period of 60 days before final implementation. EB-5 stakeholders—including investors, regional centers, and developers—should consider submitting comments to help shape the final version.

The proposed fee decreases represent an unexpected development in a space where most practitioners had only expected increases.

We will continue to monitor developments.

On July 29, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia declined to intervene in the ongoing dispute over the EB-5 investment sustainment period, leaving current U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) guidance in effect and confirming that formal regulations clarifying the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA)’s requirements are expected to be published for public comment by November 2025.

Background

On Oct. 11, 2023, USCIS released FAQs on the capital investment sustainment period under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 (RIA). The text of the RIA states that a qualifying investment for EB-5 “is expected to remain invested for not less than two years.” In preparing its FAQs, USCIS interpreted this language in the RIA to mean that EB-5 investments made after the passage of the RIA in March 2022 only need to be “expected to remain invested for not less than two years” starting from the date the investment is made and fully placed at risk in the EB-5 project, and that the old requirement that investors must keep their investment during the entire two-year conditional permanent residency period (which may be much longer than the two-year period after the funds reach the EB-5 project) no longer applies.

The FAQs also state that investors who made an investment and filed Form I-526 prior to the passage of the RIA must continue to sustain the investment until the end of conditional residence. This created two sets of “sustainment periods” governing investors who filed petitions before and after the passage of the RIA.

Invest In the USA (IIUSA), the trade association of EB-5 regional centers, filed a lawsuit against USCIS on March 29, 2024, arguing that USCIS failed to comply with the federal Administrative Procedures Act (APA) by not providing adequate public notice-and-comment rulemaking before implementing this guidance, which has significant implications for EB-5 investors. IIUSA urged the agency to issue a formal regulation through the APA to establish a five-year sustainment period, which they argued is more reasonable to the stakeholders’ reliance interests and more transparent to the investors.

The Court’s Ruling

On July 29, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order denying IIUSA’s motion for summary judgment and the government’s motion to dismiss without prejudice. The court declined to rule on the merits of the interpretation on the sustainment period guidance, finding the challenge to be premature, as no final rule has been issued by USCIS. USCIS has not yet published its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) under the RIA and expects to publish a final rule in November 2025. The court emphasized that there is no evidence of delay or urgency requiring judicial intervention at this time, despite the fact that more than three years have passed since the RIA’s enactment. Both parties are ordered to provide a joint status report in 90 days and every 60 days thereafter.

What this Means for Investors

The court declined to decide itself what the sustainment period should be, and it also declined to order USCIS to publish its regulations “faster” as was urged by IIUSA. USCIS stated multiple times in joint status filings that it was working to publish its formal regulations for the RIA by November 2025. Once published, EB-5 stakeholders will receive an opportunity to review the new regulations and provide comment to USCIS. Moreover, it is expected that the regulations proposed by USCIS will contain guidance not just on the sustainment period, but on full implementation of the RIA, including other areas like the good faith investor protections found in Subsection M of the RIA. These regulations are intended to help regional centers and EB-5 investors and projects understand how USCIS will decide applications under the RIA.

Grandfathering Provisions and Investor Protection

The RIA’s grandfathering provision exempts certain individuals or entities from new or changed requirements based on their prior status or actions. Specifically, investors who file their I-526E petitions prior to Sept. 30, 2026, will be considered “grandfathered” under the RIA; even if Congress does not extend the EB-5 program beyond its current expiration on Sept. 30, 2027, grandfathered investors can continue to pursue their immigration processes. The upcoming regulations from USCIS may clarify this provision for investors.

Conclusion

As confirmed in the July 29 court order, USCIS expects to publish an NPRM in November 2025. The NPRM will be followed by a notice-and-comment period, which will eventually be followed by a final rule. Until then, current USCIS guidance should be treated as the controlling interpretation. EB-5 stakeholders should consider preparing for formal regulatory changes and remaining engaged in the process, particularly if a notice-and-comment window is made available.

In recent months, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has sent notices of intent to terminate (NOITs) to EB-5 regional centers that have not paid the “Integrity Fees” implemented by the 2022 EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA).

Congress introduced these annual Integrity Fees to help pay for many of the new integrity measures, such as USCIS site visits, audits, and overseas investigations. Depending on the number of EB-5 investors that the regional center sponsors, the Integrity Fee is either $20,000 per year or $10,000 per year.

The USCIS roll-out of the RIA has been confusing for some stakeholders. USCIS announced on March 2, 2023, almost a year after the RIA’s passage, that the first Integrity Fee payment must be paid between March 2, 2023 (the same day as the announcement) and April 3, 2023. However, given the short notice and confusion that arose over how the fees should be calculated, USCIS kept the Integrity Fee payment portal open beyond the April 3 due date. Due to a continued lack of clarity, USCIS eventually announced an Oct. 1, 2023, due date for both the FY 2023 and FY 2024 Integrity Fees. USCIS also confirmed on its website that it would take steps to terminate any regional center that, on or before Dec. 30, 2023, had not paid the required Integrity Fees for FY 2023 and FY 2024. USCIS only published these announcements on its website; it did not send the regional centers notices about these deadlines.

Now approximately seven months later, regional centers are receiving NOITs for failure to pay the Integrity Fees. Some regional centers have made a deliberate decision not to pay the Integrity Fees as a “wind down” measure; USCIS clarified on its website that if a regional center did not pay the Integrity Fees and the regional center’s designation was terminated as a result, sponsored EB-5 investors who filed I-526 petitions prior to the March 2022 passage of the RIA (Pre-RIA Investors) could still have their I-526 and I-829 petitions approved on the merits if all other eligibility criteria were met, e.g., job creation.

However, other regional centers may have wanted to remain designated under the RIA but were not aware of the Integrity Fee due date before receiving a NOIT. Moreover, the NOIT states that USCIS will not accept any late payments, so these regional centers cannot cure the payment issue in response to the NOIT, even if they wish to remain designated.

New investors who filed I-526E petitions with a designated regional center after the passage of the RIA (RIA Investors) may face denial of their I-526E petitions if the regional center’s designation is terminated. Such investors must follow the “amendment” process provided in the RIA and associate with a new regional center in good standing. However, USCIS has not promulgated any regulations about this process, and investors could face thousands of dollars in fees to associate with a new regional center despite the issue arising on behalf of regional centers, not investors.

The RIA states that USCIS must impose a reasonable penalty on regional centers that fail to pay the Integrity Fees within 30 days of the due date and must terminate a regional center’s designation if it does not pay within 90 days after the due date. USCIS only started mailing NOITs to regional centers who did not pay the Integrity Fees in July 2024, seven months after the fees were due. It does not appear that USCIS informed regional centers about any penalties as was required prior to sending the NOITs. Had they done so, regional centers would have known that the fee was due and that they could be terminated if they did not pay by the Dec. 30, 2023, deadline.

As a result, some regional centers that wish to remain designated now face termination with no way to cure the nonpayment. A lawsuit seeking a preliminary injunction was filed in federal court in Montana that challenged USCIS’s action to terminate a regional center without mailing any notice or imposing a reasonable penalty prior to initiating a termination proceeding. The judge in that case held that USCIS appeared to act arbitrarily when it determined multiple times that it had the discretion to change the deadline for the Integrity Fee payment and not impose late fees, but could not be flexible on its decision to terminate the centers. It is not yet clear whether USCIS will appeal the decision or change its position and exercise its discretion to allow late Integrity Fee payments.

Many EB-5 stakeholders, including industry groups and bar associations, are petitioning USCIS to allow such late payments by those regional centers that wish to remain designated. Allowing late Integrity Fee payments would bring in more fees to the Integrity Fund to allow for additional investigations and audits. Moreover, if these regional centers maintain their designation, they must participate in the annual compliance process with USCIS, whereby the regional center will report to the government on the progress of its projects, which would likely contribute to the overall integrity of the EB-5 program.

On July 16, 2024, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued new guidance for the EB-5 Regional Center Program, detailing sanctions for noncompliance, adverse actions on EB-5 petitions, and special rules for good faith investors to maintain eligibility if their regional center or project is terminated or debarred.

On March 15, 2022, President Biden signed the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act (RIA) into law, substantially reforming the EB-5 program. The RIA also added significant new integrity provisions, including protection for good faith investors. Now, more than two years after its passage, USCIS has updated its policy manual to include guidance addressing new provisions the RIA added to the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), clarifying the consequences of noncompliance for regional centers, new commercial enterprises (NCEs), job creating entities (JCEs), and EB-5 investors. The new provisions update Part G, Investors, in Volume 6 of the policy manual to add provisions relating to “good faith investors” and add new authority for USCIS to sanction regional centers, new commercial enterprises, and job-creating entities at various levels for noncompliance with statutory requirements.

In particular, the new guidance clarifies the impact of USCIS terminating, debarring, or suspending noncompliant regional centers, NCEs, and JCEs, and it explains how good faith investors, including those who filed petitions prior to the RIA, may remain eligible for approval of the I-526 or I-829 petition in these scenarios. The guidance also sets forth factors and processes USCIS uses to assess sanctions and explains what constitutes fraud and material misrepresentation, deceit, criminal misuse, and threats to the national interest. The guidance further clarifies that USCIS does not sanction individuals or entities for pre-RIA actions but may still consider violations that occurred pre-RIA in determining proper sanctions for post-RIA violations.

In its Policy Manual Volume 6, Part G, Chapter 3, Section E, titled “Good Faith Investors Following Program Noncompliance by a Regional Center, New Commercial Enterprise, or Job-Creating Entity,” USCIS clarifies the actions USCIS will take if an EB-5 entity is no longer allowed to participate in the EB-5 program, such as after a regional center is terminated or an NCE or JCE is debarred. The guidance clarifies that USCIS debars individuals or entities based on noncompliance with or prohibited conduct under the RIA and does not debar individuals or entities for merely failing to establish investor eligibility for visa classification or removal of conditions, such as not creating sufficient employment, or upon receipt of requests for debarment. This means that investors cannot request a debarment to trigger the “good faith” investor protections simply where job creation is not met or where the project has failed under normal business scenarios. 

Pre-RIA Investors

Consistent with its prior guidance, USCIS confirms that if a regional center is terminated, investors who filed I-526 petitions before the RIA’s March 2022 enactment can have an I-526 petition or I-829 petition approved even if the regional center’s designation is terminated, assuming the investor otherwise meets the eligibility requirements, including sustaining the at-risk investment and creating at least 10 jobs. USCIS again confirms that direct and indirect job creation can be used to meet the requirements, even when the regional center is terminated. The policy manual explains that USCIS officers will have the discretion to make a good faith determination on a case-by-case basis to continue to approve petitions.

Where a pre-RIA investor has invested into an NCE and/or a JCE that is debarred from the EB-5 program, USCIS clarifies that the investor may seek to retain eligibility by making an investment in another new commercial enterprise. In the policy manual update, USCIS states that if a pre-RIA investor chooses to make a qualifying investment in another NCE following regional center termination, the investment amount required is the amount required by statute at the time the investor initially filed the Form I-526. As of the date of this blog, it is not clear if any “good faith” pre-RIA investors have successfully filed a new I-526 petition on this basis, or made a new $500,000 investment into a new NCE to continue to qualify for permanent residence after a regional center is terminated or after an NCE or JCE debarment, even though the required investment amount has increased under the RIA. Further engagement and clarification are required by USCIS on this point.

RIA Investors

The policy manual update confirms that when USCIS terminates a regional center that is sponsoring RIA investors who filed Form I-526E after March 2022, the investor’s NCE may associate with a new regional center that is maintaining its designation in order to continue to qualify for permanent residence. That new regional center need not cover the geographic area of the EB-5 project. EB-5 stakeholders have been seeking this change for years, believing that a change of a regional center should not be considered a “material change” to the investor’s petition. 

If an NCE or JCE is debarred for an RIA investor, the investor may retain eligibility if they associate with an NCE in good standing and, pursuant to the RIA, invest additional capital “solely to the extent necessary to satisfy remaining job creation requirements.” Practically, it may be difficult for new EB-5 projects to take additional capital from these “good faith” investors where new NCEs are seeking to subscribe investors at the new investment amounts of $1,050,000 or $800,000 but where the good faith investor seeks to invest some lesser amount only to continue to qualify for the green card. Projects should consider if they wish to create different classes of investments for varying investment amounts to accommodate these types of investors.

Additionally, USCIS states that the investor must generally file an amendment to their petition or otherwise notify USCIS that they continue to meet applicable eligibility requirements notwithstanding termination or debarment, as applicable, no later than 180 days after notification of termination or debarment. Filing an amendment to an I-526E would be costly to an investor following the April 2024 filing fee increases, but USCIS may accept additional evidence in response to a debarment notification that would not require the investor to file an amendment or pay the fee. Until USCIS promulgates a new Form I-526E, the exact procedures to be followed in this scenario remain unclear.

Terminations, Suspensions, and Sanctions

USCIS also updated Volume 6, Part G, Chapter 4, Section H, “Terminations, Suspensions, and Other Sanctions,” which specifies violations permitting various sanctions for bad faith actions by regional centers, ranging from fines to suspension or termination in more serious cases. This update exemplifies USCIS’s continued efforts to crack down on regional centers engaging in activities that may undermine the integrity of the EB-5 program. USCIS may sanction regional centers not only for bad faith actions but also for possessing knowledge of bad faith or fraudulent actions. Given this threshold, the sanctions set forth in the policy manual encourage regional centers to conduct thorough due diligence and enforce close oversight of project operations to minimize the likelihood and severity of penalty for violations.

The policy manual further provides examples of sanctionable violations as an added warning and clarification to EB-5 participants. The policy update emphasizes that regional centers have a responsibility to take reasonable action to avoid violation of law, even if a regional center, commercial enterprise, or JCE is new. Inexperience in the EB-5 domain does not excuse actions that violate the law, nor does it excuse partnering with entities whose activities could be considered bad faith. This further confirms USCIS’s emphasis on the need for EB-5 program participants to perform necessary due diligence and maintenance activities to ensure compliance at all times.

The policy manual reiterates USCIS authority to levy sanctions for noncompliance by various EB-5 program participants, including measures like suspension, debarment, and termination. The new chapter provides a thorough breakdown of USCIS’s general process when it determines that a violation has occurred warranting suspension, debarment, or termination. This not only allows EB-5 participants to hold USCIS accountable to the process it has laid out in the future but also provides EB-5 participants with improved insight into next steps once a notice of intent to sanction is issued.

The policy manual is instructive of the types of actions that may be sanctioned as involving fraud, deceit, material misrepresentation, or criminal misuse, providing specific examples of actions falling under these categories. These examples intend to clearly outline actions that are sanctionable to discourage bad faith actions on the part of EB-5 participants as well as to educate individuals or entities who may be unfamiliar with the EB-5 program. USCIS’s policy update emphasizes the seriousness of intentional bad acts and warns of the ramifications for such actions. Regional centers, commercial enterprises, job creating entities, and investors should oversee their operations carefully to ensure compliance with USCIS’s updated policies and be mindful of who they are partnering with throughout the EB-5 process to avoid penalty.